Can you migrate my Zapier setup to Make?

Yes. Migration is a common project when Zapier task costs climb. I rebuild each Zap as a Make scenario, run both in parallel during a validation window, then switch over with no gap in coverage.

Is Make cheaper than Zapier?

Almost always, for equivalent workloads. Make bills per operation and its paid tiers include roughly 3–5x more volume than similarly priced Zapier plans. The saving grows with volume: high-volume users save hundreds per month.

Do you support scenarios after delivery?

Every project includes a support window after delivery, and optional ongoing maintenance after that. Scenarios also ship with error alerting, so you know about problems before your customers do.

Make.com Automation Services

I build Make.com scenarios for small businesses that need more logic than Zapier offers at a lower price point. Make sits between Zapier and n8n: visual and approachable, but with real routers, iterators, and data stores for genuinely complex flows.

What you get

Make scenarios with routers, filters, and iterators structured so they stay readable
Error handlers on every scenario: Make silently pauses broken scenarios unless you plan for failure
Data stores and webhooks configured where your apps lack native modules
Operations-usage review so the plan you pay for matches what you run

What is Make and how is it different from Zapier?

Make (formerly Integromat) is a visual automation platform where workflows are drawn as scenarios on a canvas. Compared to Zapier it offers far more control (routers for branching, iterators for lists, and built-in data stores) at roughly a third of the price per operation. The trade-off is a steeper learning curve, which is usually why businesses bring me in.

What do I build in Make?

Typical builds: lead flows from ads and forms into CRMs with source tagging, order and invoice processing between commerce and accounting tools, content pipelines that move assets through review and publishing, and scheduled data syncs between systems that lack a native integration. If a scenario needs an AI step, Make connects to Claude or GPT through HTTP modules.

Why do Make scenarios break, and how do I prevent it?

Make pauses a scenario after repeated errors, and unless someone configured error handling, nobody finds out until the pipeline has been dead for a week. Every scenario I deliver includes error routes and a notification path (email, Slack, or Telegram) so failures surface in minutes. This single practice separates automations a business can rely on from ones it quietly abandons.

Frequently asked questions

Can you migrate my Zapier setup to Make?: Yes. Migration is a common project when Zapier task costs climb. I rebuild each Zap as a Make scenario, run both in parallel during a validation window, then switch over with no gap in coverage.
Is Make cheaper than Zapier?: Almost always, for equivalent workloads. Make bills per operation and its paid tiers include roughly 3–5x more volume than similarly priced Zapier plans. The saving grows with volume: high-volume users save hundreds per month.
Do you support scenarios after delivery?: Every project includes a support window after delivery, and optional ongoing maintenance after that. Scenarios also ship with error alerting, so you know about problems before your customers do.

Ready to scope it?

Describe the process you want automated. You'll get an honest read on feasibility and a monthly retainer quote, no obligation.

Get in touch